Normal 0 false false false EN-US X-NONE X-NONE MicrosoftInternetExplorer4
The is in response to the court ruling last week where Judge Thomas Wingate essentially ordered the owners of 141 online gambling domain names to appear at a Nov. 17 forfeiture hearing and demonstrate they are making efforts to block their sites from residents of Kentucky.
iMEGA believes Kentucky's lawyers have sought these domain names, all related to internet gaming and advertising, in an effort to protect Kentucky's own in-state gambling operations from competition, and to extract tens of millions of dollars in penalties from domain registrants.
"Since the lower court elected to ignore Kentucky law, and instead reached back to a law the current one supplanted, to find a rationale justifying these seizures, we have no choice but to go to the Court of Appeals," said Joe Brennan Jr. iMEGA chairman and CEO. "This errant ruling affects far more than Kentucky and the domain names currently at risk. If this is allowed to stand, you'll see other actions like this, targeting other segments of internet media, at the state and local level, both here and abroad."
iMEGA has asked the Court of Appeals to intercede, alleging that the lower court does not have jurisdiction over the domain names as none of the names are owned by Kentucky residents or managed by in-state domain registrars. iMEGA also asked the court to consider the serious constitutional violations by the lower court.
iMEGA's lawyers included specific grounds for the higher court to intercede including the misapplication of Kentucky's own "gambling devices" statute to include domain names. The key issue, according to iMEGA, is that there is no basis for civil forfeiture in the Kentucky statute and that Justice and Public Safety Secretary J. Michael Brown lacked the authority to bring about this action.
There has been tremendous negative feedback regarding the court decision to block domain names from the online community and earlier this week representatives from Poker Player's Alliance (PPA), Internet Commerce Association (ICA) and the aforementioned iMEGA all spoke out against the court ruling.
ICA president Jeremiah Johnston called the decision "dangerous" while PPA president John Pappas said he believed the judge to be wrong.
Related Articles:
[ul][li]Industry experts react to Kentucky ruling[/li][li]Kentucky judge rules against gambling domains[/li][li]Ruling in Kentucky domain name case today[/li][li]Kentucky forfeiture hearing issues multiply[/li][/ul]Visit PokerListings.com
|
Comments |
Poker News
♦ Annie Duke Cast In♦ Titan Poker Tips 12 For 2
♦ Defendants File Motion To
♦ Pokerstars Breaks More Re
♦ Traffic Report New High
♦ Leaderboard Rundown Sprs
♦ Club Titan Simplifies Rew
♦ Phil Ivey Is Up To Durrrr
♦ John Phan Is Player Of Th
♦ Ultimatebet Changes Uboc
♦ First Sunday Million Of 2
♦ Durrrr Issues Million Dol
♦ Rory Brennan Wins Partypo
♦ Espn To Present Wsop Euro
♦ Ppa Hands Out Grades To C
♦ Partypoker Com Irish Cham
♦ Back To Business For Gus
♦ Pokerstars Wcop Heads To
♦ Czechs To Authorize Onlin
♦ Patrik Antonius And Durrr
♦ Pamela Anderson To Play A
♦ Back In The Bahamas The
♦ Titan Poker Launches Club
♦ High Stakes Hold Em 20
♦ Eastgate Tops Best Europe
♦ Ziigmund And Dwan Get Lat
♦ Joanie Loves Jochee At Fu
♦ Celebs To Play Poker Tour
♦ Year In Review Dark Day
♦ A Very Merry December Acc
♦ 2009 Southern Poker Champ
♦ Uigea Repeal In Cards For
♦ Year In Review Wsop Cham
♦ Pokerstars Shatters Onlin
♦ Ip Sakisaki Wins Gigantic
♦ Ftp Kicks Off Second Holi
♦ Phil Galfond Puts Hurt On
♦ Man Kicked From Poker Gam
♦ Year In Review Tournamen
♦ Larsluzak Cleans A Couple
♦ Lapc Events Dish Out 10k
♦ Hansen Plays Santa On Chr
♦ Pokerstars Poker Camp Sch
♦ Ultimatebet Dishing Out U
♦ Year In Review Wsop Take
♦ Year In Review Wsop Take
♦ Mr B 2 U Son Gives Omgcla
♦ Pokerstars To End Year Wi
♦ Hand With Hellmuth Trigge
♦ Year In Review Return To